米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 6PM WEEKDAY NEWSCAST
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Lawmakers remove 'revenge' tax provision from Trump's big bill after Treasury Department request

Lawmakers remove 'revenge' tax provision from Trump's big bill after Treasury Department request
AP logo
Updated: 8:19 AM CDT Jun 27, 2025
Editorial Standards 鈸�
Advertisement
Lawmakers remove 'revenge' tax provision from Trump's big bill after Treasury Department request
AP logo
Updated: 8:19 AM CDT Jun 27, 2025
Editorial Standards 鈸�
Congressional Republicans agreed to remove the so-called revenge tax provision from President Donald Trump鈥檚 big bill on Thursday after a request by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.The Section 899 provision that was nixed would have allowed the federal government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging 鈥渦nfair foreign taxes鈥� on U.S. companies.The measure was expected to lead many companies to avoid investing in the U.S. out of concern that they could face steep taxes. But the removal of the provision adds a wrinkle to Republicans鈥� plans to try to offset the cost of the massive package.Bessent said in an X post that he made the request to lawmakers after reaching an agreement with other countries on the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Global Tax Deal. He said that after 鈥渕onths of productive dialogue,鈥� they would 鈥渁nnounce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests.鈥漇enate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., said they would remove the provision. But, they noted, 鈥淐ongressional Republicans stand ready to take immediate action if the other parties walk away from this deal or slow walk its implementation.鈥漈he removal of the provision will provide 鈥済reater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond,鈥� Bessent said in his post.An analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestl茅, estimates that the provision would have cost the U.S. 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product.The Global Business Alliance was among several groups that signed a letter addressed to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Crapo warning of the consequences of Section 899.Republicans are rushing to finish the package this week to meet the president's Fourth of July deadline for passage.Earlier Thursday, the Senate parliamentarian advised that a Medicaid provider tax overhaul central to the spending bill does not adhere to the chamber鈥檚 procedural rules, delivering a crucial blow to Republicans, who are counting on big cuts to Medicaid and other programs to offset trillions of dollars in Trump tax breaks.

Congressional Republicans agreed to remove the so-called revenge tax provision from President Donald Trump鈥檚 big bill on Thursday after a request by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.

The Section 899 provision that was nixed would have allowed the federal government to impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging 鈥渦nfair foreign taxes鈥� on U.S. companies.

Advertisement

The measure was expected to lead many companies to avoid investing in the U.S. out of concern that they could face steep taxes. But the removal of the provision adds a wrinkle to Republicans鈥� plans to try to offset the cost of the massive package.

Bessent said in an X post that he made the request to lawmakers after reaching an agreement with other countries on the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Global Tax Deal. He said that after 鈥渕onths of productive dialogue,鈥� they would 鈥渁nnounce a joint understanding among G7 countries that defends American interests.鈥�

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., said they would remove the provision. But, they noted, 鈥淐ongressional Republicans stand ready to take immediate action if the other parties walk away from this deal or slow walk its implementation.鈥�

The removal of the provision will provide 鈥済reater certainty and stability for the global economy and will enhance growth and investment in the United States and beyond,鈥� Bessent said in his post.

An analysis by the Global Business Alliance, a trade group representing international companies such as Toyota and Nestl茅, estimates that the provision would have cost the U.S. 360,000 jobs and $55 billion annually over 10 years in lost gross domestic product.

The Global Business Alliance was among several groups that signed a letter addressed to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Crapo warning of the consequences of Section 899.

Republicans are rushing to finish the package this week to meet the president's Fourth of July deadline for passage.

Earlier Thursday, the Senate parliamentarian advised that a Medicaid provider tax overhaul central to the spending bill does not adhere to the chamber鈥檚 procedural rules, delivering a crucial blow to Republicans, who are counting on big cuts to Medicaid and other programs to offset trillions of dollars in Trump tax breaks.