米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 米兰体育 13 10p Newscast
Live Now
Advertisement

Here's how the Supreme Court ruling on Planned Parenthood funding could impact Medicaid patients

The Supreme Court is paving the way for states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood, a ruling that could have wide-ranging ripple effects for patients

Here's how the Supreme Court ruling on Planned Parenthood funding could impact Medicaid patients

The Supreme Court is paving the way for states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood, a ruling that could have wide-ranging ripple effects for patients

Washington News Bureau logo
Updated: 3:56 PM CDT Jun 26, 2025
Editorial Standards 鈸�
Advertisement
Here's how the Supreme Court ruling on Planned Parenthood funding could impact Medicaid patients

The Supreme Court is paving the way for states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood, a ruling that could have wide-ranging ripple effects for patients

Washington News Bureau logo
Updated: 3:56 PM CDT Jun 26, 2025
Editorial Standards 鈸�
The Supreme Court is paving the way for states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood, a ruling that could have wide-ranging ripple effects for patients. See the story in the video aboveThe 6-3 decision released on Thursday settles a yearslong legal battle stemming from South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster's 2018 executive order seeking to remove abortion clinics from the state's Medicaid provider list. Federal law already bans public health care funding from being used for abortions in the vast majority of cases, but many Medicaid recipients get other services from Planned Parenthood, including contraception, cancer screening and pregnancy testing. The high court鈥檚 decision blocks Medicaid patients from suing to make sure they can visit the provider of their choice. Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the court鈥檚 majority, said allowing individuals to take legal action in these cases can 鈥渇orce governments to direct money away from public services and spend it instead on litigation.鈥濃淭he job of resolving how best to weigh those competing costs and benefits belongs to the people鈥檚 elected representatives, not unelected judges charged with applying the law as they find it,鈥� Gorsuch wrote. In a scathing dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the ruling is likely to result in 鈥渢angible harm to real people.鈥� 鈥淢ore concretely, it will strip those South Carolinians 鈥� and countless other Medicaid recipients around the country 鈥� of a deeply personal freedom: the ability to decide who treats us at our most vulnerable,鈥� Jackson further wrote. Katherine Farris, chief medical officer for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, said the impact will initially be felt only in South Carolina but could later spread if other states decide to pursue similar restrictions on Medicaid funding. 鈥淭he Supreme Court has now given the green light to other states to do the same as South Carolina and tell people where they can and cannot go for preventative health care, and the long-term consequences of that decision are devastating,鈥� Farris said during a press conference after the ruling. 鈥淲e are working hard not to turn people away, but the reality is we may not be able to do that for long.鈥漈he Supreme Court ruling was celebrated by anti-abortion advocates, as well as Governor McMaster. "Seven years ago, we took a stand to protect the sanctity of life and defend South Carolina's authority and values 鈥� and today, we are finally victorious," said Gov. McMaster in a statement. "The legality of my executive order prohibiting taxpayer dollars from being used to fund abortion providers like Planned Parenthood has been affirmed by the highest court in the land.鈥滻t鈥檚 part of a broader Republican push that is also playing out in Congress. The budget bill backed by President Donald Trump also seeks to cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. The organization warns that it would put about 200 centers at risk of closure. Over four in ten individuals with Medicaid say they have received services at Planned Parenthood, according to a health tracking poll from KFF published earlier this year. Another KFF analysis says that, in many communities, Planned Parenthood is the only clinic offering reproductive health care. The health policy research group found, in addition to South Carolina, states like Idaho and Tennessee have pending Section 1115 waiver applications at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services seeking to exclude Planned Parenthood from their Medicaid programs.

The Supreme Court is paving the way for states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood, a ruling that could have wide-ranging ripple effects for patients.

See the story in the video above

Advertisement

The 6-3 decision released on Thursday settles a yearslong legal battle stemming from South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster's 2018 executive order seeking to remove abortion clinics from the state's Medicaid provider list.

Federal law already bans public health care funding from being used for abortions in the vast majority of cases, but many Medicaid recipients get other services from Planned Parenthood, including contraception, cancer screening and pregnancy testing.

The high court鈥檚 decision blocks Medicaid patients from suing to make sure they can visit the provider of their choice.

Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the court鈥檚 majority, said allowing individuals to take legal action in these cases can 鈥渇orce governments to direct money away from public services and spend it instead on litigation.鈥�

鈥淭he job of resolving how best to weigh those competing costs and benefits belongs to the people鈥檚 elected representatives, not unelected judges charged with applying the law as they find it,鈥� Gorsuch wrote.

In a scathing dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said the ruling is likely to result in 鈥渢angible harm to real people.鈥�

鈥淢ore concretely, it will strip those South Carolinians 鈥� and countless other Medicaid recipients around the country 鈥� of a deeply personal freedom: the ability to decide who treats us at our most vulnerable,鈥� Jackson further wrote.

Katherine Farris, chief medical officer for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, said the impact will initially be felt only in South Carolina but could later spread if other states decide to pursue similar restrictions on Medicaid funding.

鈥淭he Supreme Court has now given the green light to other states to do the same as South Carolina and tell people where they can and cannot go for preventative health care, and the long-term consequences of that decision are devastating,鈥� Farris said during a press conference after the ruling. 鈥淲e are working hard not to turn people away, but the reality is we may not be able to do that for long.鈥�

The Supreme Court ruling was celebrated by anti-abortion advocates, as well as Governor McMaster.

"Seven years ago, we took a stand to protect the sanctity of life and defend South Carolina's authority and values 鈥� and today, we are finally victorious," said Gov. McMaster in a statement. "The legality of my executive order prohibiting taxpayer dollars from being used to fund abortion providers like Planned Parenthood has been affirmed by the highest court in the land.鈥�

It鈥檚 part of a broader Republican push that is also playing out in Congress. The budget bill backed by President Donald Trump also seeks to cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. The organization warns that it would put about 200 centers at risk of closure.

Over four in ten individuals with Medicaid say they have received services at Planned Parenthood, according to a health tracking poll from KFF published earlier this year. says that, in many communities, Planned Parenthood is the only clinic offering reproductive health care.

The health policy research group found, in addition to South Carolina, states like Idaho and Tennessee have pending Section 1115 waiver applications at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services seeking to exclude Planned Parenthood from their Medicaid programs.