米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST Weekday Morning Newscast
Live Now
Advertisement

House passes bill requiring proof of US citizenship to vote, a Trump priority

House passes bill requiring proof of US citizenship to vote, a Trump priority
JON, MEGHAN -- SECRETARY OF STATE SHENNA BELLOWS SAYS THERE ARE LARGE GROUPS OF PEOPLE WHO WOULD SUFFER FROM IF THE SAVE ACT IS PASSED. INCLUDING OLDER MAINERS -- PEOPLE WHO LIVE IN RURAL COMMUNITIES -- AND MARRIED "NOW KEEP IN MIND THE 2024 ELECTIONS WERE SAFE FREE AND SECURE." 00;01;59;15 MAINE SECRETARY OF STATE SHENNA BELLOWS IS JOINED BY WEST COAST DECMORATIC SECRETARIES WHO SAY THE SAVE ACT WILL MAKE IT HARD FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE IN FEDERAL AND STATE ELECTIONS. "THE SAVE ACT WOULD DISPORTIONALLY HARM MARRIED WOMEN, SENIORS AND RURAL VOTERS." 00;02;43;21 AFTER THE ONLINE PRESS CONFERENCE -- I CAUGHT UP WITH SECRETARY BELLOWS AT THE STATE HOUSE. MARRIED - OR DIVORCED - WOMEN - WOULD BE AFFECTED. BECAUSE THEY WOULD HAVE TO BRING MARRIAGE LICENSES TO PROVE THEIR NAME CHANGED IF IT DOESN'T MATCH A BIRTH CERTIFICATE. "WE KNOW IS THAT WITH DIVORCED WOMEN IN PARTICULAR, BUT ALSO MARRIED WOMEN, THEY MAY NOT THINK TO BRING THEIR MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE OR THEIR OWN MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE TO THE POLLS ON ELECTION DAY." 20;13;19;08 HERE IN MAINE AND ACROSS THE COUNTRY A PERSON ALREADY NEEDS TO BE A CITIZEN TO VOTE IN FEDERAL AND STATE ELECTIONS. BUT THE SAVE ACT SPECIFIES WHAT DOCUMENTS ARE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP WHICH INCLUDES PLACES THAT HAVE A BIRTH PLACE AND YOUR LEGAL NAME. IF A NAME DOESN'T MATCH -- YOU WOULD HAVE TO BRING DOCUMENTAION SHOWING WHY. "THAT WOULD INCLUDE THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY FROM THEIR BIRTH CERTIFICATE THROUGH THEIR NAME CHANGES." 20;13;11;07 ABOUT 69 MILLION IN THE U-S HAVE IDS THAT DO NOT MATCH THEIR BIRTH CERTIFICATE. BELLOWS AND OTHER SECRETARIES SAY THIS WOULD MEAN THOSE WOMEN WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO VOTE. THE BILL ALSO WOULD CRIMINALIZE POLLING STAFF WHO REGISTER SOMEONE TO VOTE IF THAT PERSON DOESN'T PRESENT THE CORRECT DOCUMENTS. "THE SAVE ACT WOULD REQUIRE THAT EVERY ELECTION OFFICIAL, UNDER PENALTY OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, REQUIRE THAT EVERY VOTER UPDATING THEIR VOTER REGISTRATION OR REGISTERING TO VOTE FOR THE FIRST TIME BRING DOCUMENTARY PROOF OF THEIR CITIZENSHIP" 20;15;40;03 THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES WAS EXPECTED TO VOTE ON THE SAVE ACT THIS WEEK -- BUT IT HAS BEEN DELAYED. CONGRESSWOMAN CHELLIE PINGREE'
Advertisement
House passes bill requiring proof of US citizenship to vote, a Trump priority
House Republicans passed one of their signature issues for the year on Thursday, approving legislation to require proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote for federal elections, one of President Donald Trump's top election-related priorities.Democrats lined up against the bill and warned that it risks disenfranchising millions of Americans who do not have ready access to the proper documents.Trump has long signaled a desire to change how elections are run in the U.S. and last month issued a sweeping executive order that included a citizenship requirement among other election-related changes.Top Republicans have argued the legislation, known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, is necessary to ensure only citizens vote in U.S. elections and 鈥渃ements into law鈥� Trump鈥檚 order.鈥淚f we have a noncitizen who votes in an election, that cancels out the vote of a legal citizen,鈥� said U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil, a Wisconsin Republican who chairs the House Committee on Administration, which handles election-related legislation.This marks Republicans鈥� second attempt at passing the SAVE Act. It passed the House last year but failed in the Senate amid Democratic opposition.It鈥檚 unlikely to fare any better this year. While Republicans won control of the Senate last fall, they have a narrow majority that falls short of the 60 votes they would need to overcome a filibuster.Republicans hammered on the issue during last year鈥檚 presidential election, even though voting by noncitizens is already illegal and can lead to felony charges and deportation.The SAVE Act would require all applicants using the federal voter registration form to provide documentary proof of citizenship in person at their local election office. Among the acceptable documents are a valid U.S. passport and a government-issued photo ID card presented alongside a certified birth certificate.Democrats and voting rights groups warn the legislation could lead to widespread voter disenfranchisement if it were to become law. The Brennan Center for Justice and other groups estimated in a 2023 report that 9% of U.S. citizens of voting age, or 21.3 million people, do not have proof of their citizenship readily available. Almost half of Americans don鈥檛 have a U.S. passport.In Kansas, a proof-of-citizenship requirement that passed in 2011 ended up blocking the voter registrations of more than 31,000 U.S. citizens in the state who were otherwise eligible to vote. The law was later declared unconstitutional by a federal court and hasn鈥檛 been enforced since 2018.鈥淭he SAVE Act would force American citizens into a paperwork nightmare, turning every voter registration into a bureaucratic tsunami of government red tape,鈥� said Rep. Joe Morelle, a Democrat from New York who testified recently in opposition to the bill.A further concern: Married women would need multiple documents to prove their citizenship if they have changed their name. It was a complication that arose in town hall elections held last month in New Hampshire, which was enforcing a new state law requiring proof of citizenship to register. One woman, since divorced, told a local elections clerk that her first marriage was decades ago in Florida and that she no longer had the marriage certificate showing her name change. She was unable to register and vote for her town election.Republicans have defended the legislation as necessary to restore public confidence in elections and say it allows states to adopt procedures to help voters comply. They have disputed Democratic characterizations of the bill.鈥淭he truth is, those who were registered to vote would still be able to vote under their current registration,鈥� said Rep. Chip Roy, a Texas Republican who sponsored the bill. 鈥淲e have mechanisms giving the state fairly significant deference to make determinations as to how to structure the situation where an individual does have a name change, which of course is often women.鈥滱drian Fontes, a Democrat who serves as Arizona鈥檚 top state election official, described the proposal as a solution in search of a problem, given how rare noncitizen voting is.鈥淲hat it is doing is capitalizing on fear -- fear built on a lie,鈥� Fontes said. 鈥淎nd the lie is that a whole bunch of people who aren鈥檛 eligible are voting. That鈥檚 just not true.鈥�

House Republicans passed one of their signature issues for the year on Thursday, approving legislation to require proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote for federal elections, one of President Donald Trump's top election-related priorities.

Democrats lined up against the bill and warned that it risks disenfranchising millions of Americans who do not have ready access to the proper documents.

Advertisement

Trump has long signaled a desire to change how elections are run in the U.S. and last month issued a sweeping executive order that included a citizenship requirement among other election-related changes.

Top Republicans have argued the legislation, known as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, is necessary to ensure only citizens vote in U.S. elections and 鈥渃ements into law鈥� Trump鈥檚 order.

鈥淚f we have a noncitizen who votes in an election, that cancels out the vote of a legal citizen,鈥� said U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil, a Wisconsin Republican who chairs the House Committee on Administration, which handles election-related legislation.

This marks Republicans鈥� second attempt at passing the SAVE Act. It passed the House last year but failed in the Senate amid Democratic opposition.

It鈥檚 unlikely to fare any better this year. While Republicans won control of the Senate last fall, they have a narrow majority that falls short of the 60 votes they would need to overcome a filibuster.

Republicans hammered on the issue during last year鈥檚 presidential election, even though voting by noncitizens is already illegal and can lead to felony charges and deportation.

would require all applicants using the federal voter registration form to provide documentary proof of citizenship in person at their local election office. Among the acceptable documents are a valid U.S. passport and a government-issued photo ID card presented alongside a certified birth certificate.

Democrats and voting rights groups warn the legislation could lead to widespread voter disenfranchisement if it were to become law. The Brennan Center for Justice and other groups estimated in a 2023 report that 9% of U.S. citizens of voting age, or 21.3 million people, do not have proof of their citizenship readily available. Almost half of Americans don鈥檛 have a U.S. passport.

In Kansas, a proof-of-citizenship requirement that passed in 2011 ended up blocking the voter registrations of more than 31,000 U.S. citizens in the state who were otherwise eligible to vote. The law was later declared unconstitutional by a federal court and hasn鈥檛 been enforced since 2018.

鈥淭he SAVE Act would force American citizens into a paperwork nightmare, turning every voter registration into a bureaucratic tsunami of government red tape,鈥� said Rep. Joe Morelle, a Democrat from New York who testified recently in opposition to the bill.

A further concern: Married women would need multiple documents to prove their citizenship if they have changed their name. It was a complication that arose in town hall elections held last month in New Hampshire, which was enforcing a new state law requiring proof of citizenship to register. One woman, since divorced, told a local elections clerk that her first marriage was decades ago in Florida and that she no longer had the marriage certificate showing her name change. She was unable to register and vote for her town election.

Republicans have defended the legislation as necessary to restore public confidence in elections and say it allows states to adopt procedures to help voters comply. They have disputed Democratic characterizations of the bill.

鈥淭he truth is, those who were registered to vote would still be able to vote under their current registration,鈥� said Rep. Chip Roy, a Texas Republican who sponsored the bill. 鈥淲e have mechanisms giving the state fairly significant deference to make determinations as to how to structure the situation where an individual does have a name change, which of course is often women.鈥�

Adrian Fontes, a Democrat who serves as Arizona鈥檚 top state election official, described the proposal as a solution in search of a problem, given how rare noncitizen voting is.

鈥淲hat it is doing is capitalizing on fear -- fear built on a lie,鈥� Fontes said. 鈥淎nd the lie is that a whole bunch of people who aren鈥檛 eligible are voting. That鈥檚 just not true.鈥�