米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 米兰体育 13 Morning News
Coming up Soon
Advertisement

'Endangers us all': Lawmakers, activists speak out as Gov. Ivey signs 'Back the Blue' bill

'Endangers us all': Lawmakers, activists speak out as Gov. Ivey signs 'Back the Blue' bill
A FINAL ACT FOR STATE LAWMAKERS IN THE REGULAR SESSION. INCREASED LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR POLICE OFFICERS. THANK YOU FOR JOINING US AT FIVE. I鈥橫 SHERI FALK. I鈥橫 GUY RAWLINGS. THE LEGISLATION IS CALLED THE BACK THE BLUE BILL. IT SETS LEGAL STANDARDS FOR USE OF FORCE AND PROVIDES FOR AN IMMUNITY HEARING. REPUBLICANS FULLY SUPPORTING THE LEGISLATION. GOVERNOR IVEY PUTTING HER SIGNATURE ON IT TODAY. 米兰体育 13. ERYN LEWELLYN JOINS US NOW. MANY DEMOCRATS STRONGLY OPPOSE THIS. ERIN. YEAH, THAT鈥橲 EXACTLY RIGHT. AND ONE OF THOSE IS STATE SENATOR ROGER, STATE SENATOR ROGER SMITHERMAN. AND HE TOLD ME THAT HE GREW UP DURING THE JIM CROW ERA AND SAYS HE鈥橲 BEEN RACIALLY PROFILED BY POLICE FIVE TIMES. THAT鈥橲 A LARGE REASON WHY HE鈥橲 OPPOSED THE BILL, SAYING IT PUTS A TARGET ON THE BACKS OF BLACK PEOPLE. WITH THE STROKE OF A PEN, GOVERNOR KAY IVEY SIGNED HOUSE BILL 202 ON THURSDAY. WE ARE TAKING AWAY. CITIZENS RIGHTS BY NOT LETTING THEM HAVE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION. COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BACK, THE BLUE BILL. STATE SENATOR ROGER SMITHERMAN FEELS THAT鈥橲 EXACTLY WHAT THE LAW WILL DO, TAKING AWAY PROTECTIONS AGAINST POLICE FROM THE PEOPLE. ONCE UPON A TIME, WE DIDN鈥橳 HAVE THAT IN OUR COUNTRY, IN OUR LIFE, AND WE FOUGHT TO GET THAT SO THAT CITIZENS WOULD HAVE A RECOURSE. THE BILL WOULD PROTECT OFFICERS UNLESS THEY ACT RECKLESSLY, WITHOUT JUSTIFICATION, OR VIOLATE WELL-ESTABLISHED LEGAL RIGHTS, AND OUTLINES CONDITIONS FOR WHERE EXCESSIVE FORCE IS JUSTIFIED. LAW ENFORCEMENT WOULD NOT BE CHARGED UNLESS THE FORCE USED ON A PERSON VIOLATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AGAINST EXCESSIVE FORCE. BLACK LIVES ACTIVIST CARL MCCLURE SAYS THE BILL IS DANGEROUS AND SENDS A CLEAR MESSAGE THAT POLICE OFFICERS ARE ABOVE THE LAW. AT A TIME WHEN COMMUNITIES, ESPECIALLY BLACK COMMUNITIES, ARE DEMANDING ACCOUNTABILITY, THIS BILL, HB 202, DOES JUST THE OPPOSITE. IT FURTHER REINFORCES SYSTEMS THAT CRIMINALIZE AND TRAUMATIZE AND ENDANGERS US ALL. IN A STATEMENT, THE STATE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE SAID IN PART, THE BILL IS A CRUCIAL STEP IN ENSURING OUR OFFICERS HAVE THE TOOLS, RESOURCES AND PROTECTIONS THEY NEED TO SERVE AND PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES EFFECTIVELY. AND SMITHERMAN FEELS TAKING AWAY THOSE RIGHTS WILL SPECIFICALLY TARGET BLACK PEOPLE AND CAUSE THE SHIFT IN POLICING. OPEN SEASON. THEY WENT ALL THE WAY. SITUATION WHERE YOU GOT YOU DIDN鈥橳 GET THE BENEFIT OF DOUBT AT ALL. AND OF COURSE YOU ADMIT THE SITUATION. YOU ARE GUILTY UNTIL YOU PROVE YOU鈥橰E NOT HAOHAO SMITHERMAN TELLS ME THAT PART OF THE BILL IS STARTING A REVIEW PANEL. THAT FIRST REVIEW WILL HAPPEN WITHIN THE FIRST YEAR OF THE BILL GOING INTO EFFECT. THAT WILL HAPPEN ON OCTOBER 1ST. HE DOESN鈥橳 BELIEVE THERE WILL BE ANY EFFORTS TO OVERTURN IT, BUT HE DOES BELIEVE THAT THERE WILL
Advertisement
'Endangers us all': Lawmakers, activists speak out as Gov. Ivey signs 'Back the Blue' bill
Gov. Kay Ivey signed off on "Back the Blue" House Bill 202 on Thursday.This legislation is a part of Ivey's crime reduction plan.This controversial bill states that it will legally protect police officers from being held responsible for their actions as long as they fall within their authority and responsibilities.State Sen. Rodger Smitherman expressed his disapproval of the bill. He explained that he grew up during the Jim Crow era and has experienced being racially profiled by the police several times.Smitherman feels that taking away these rights will specifically target Black people and calls the shift in policing "open season." "Once upon a time, we didn't have that in our country, in our life. And we fought to get that so that citizens would have a recourse," Smitherman said. The bill would protect officers unless they act recklessly, without justification or violate well-established legal rights.The legislation also outlines conditions where excessive force is justified. Law enforcement would not be charged unless the force used on a person violates constitutional rights against excessive force. Smitherman said the law will take away people's protections against the police."We are taking away citizens' rights by not letting them have due process, equal protection," Smitherman said.Black Lives Matter activist Cara McClure says the bill is dangerous and sends a clear message that police officers are above the law."At a time when communities, especially Black communities, are demanding accountability, this bill, House Bill 202, does just the opposite," McClure said. "It further reinforces systems that criminalize and traumatize and endangers us all."In a statement, the Alabama State Fraternal Order of Police said the bill is "a crucial step in ensuring our officers have the tools, resources and protections they need to serve and protect our communities effectively."Smitherman said that part of the bill is starting a review panel. The first review will happen within a year of the bill going into effect, which will be on Oct. 1.While he doesn't believe there will be any efforts to overturn the legislation, Smitherman does believe there will be some situations that could've been avoided had the bill not been signed.

Gov. Kay Ivey signed off on "Back the Blue" on Thursday.

This legislation is a part of Ivey's .

Advertisement

This controversial bill states that it will legally protect police officers from being held responsible for their actions as long as they fall within their authority and responsibilities.

State Sen. Rodger Smitherman expressed his disapproval of the bill. He explained that he grew up during the Jim Crow era and has experienced being racially profiled by the police several times.

Smitherman feels that taking away these rights will specifically target Black people and calls the shift in policing "open season."

"Once upon a time, we didn't have that in our country, in our life. And we fought to get that so that citizens would have a recourse," Smitherman said.

The bill would protect officers unless they act recklessly, without justification or violate well-established legal rights.

The legislation also outlines conditions where excessive force is justified. Law enforcement would not be charged unless the force used on a person violates constitutional rights against excessive force.

Smitherman said the law will take away people's protections against the police.

"We are taking away citizens' rights by not letting them have due process, equal protection," Smitherman said.

activist Cara McClure says the bill is dangerous and sends a clear message that police officers are above the law.

"At a time when communities, especially Black communities, are demanding accountability, this bill, House Bill 202, does just the opposite," McClure said. "It further reinforces systems that criminalize and traumatize and endangers us all."

In a statement, the said the bill is "a crucial step in ensuring our officers have the tools, resources and protections they need to serve and protect our communities effectively."

Smitherman said that part of the bill is starting a review panel. The first review will happen within a year of the bill going into effect, which will be on Oct. 1.

While he doesn't believe there will be any efforts to overturn the legislation, Smitherman does believe there will be some situations that could've been avoided had the bill not been signed.