米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 米兰体育 13 Midday Newscast
Live Now
Advertisement

Minneapolis voters reject replacing police with new agency after George Floyd's death

Minneapolis voters reject replacing police with new agency after George Floyd's death
SOLED:DA WELCOME BACK TO MATTER OF FACT. ON TUESDAY, VOTERS IN MINNEAPOLIS WILL DECIDE WHETHER TO OVERHAUL THEIR POLICE DEPARTNT.ME THE PROPOSED AMENDME TNTO THE CITY鈥橲 CHARTER WOULD LIMIT THE SIZE AND SCOPE OTHF E POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND INCORPORATE A PUBLIC HEALTH APPROA.CH SUPPORTERS SAY THE PROPOSAL LLWI ADDRESS MANY OF THE PROBLEMS THAT LED TO THE 2020 KILLING OF GEORGE FLOYD BY MINNEAPOSLI POLICE OFFICER DEREK CHAUVIN, WHO WAS CONVICTED OF MURDER. MINISTER JANAE BATES IS E COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR FOR YES-4-MINNEAPOLIS, THE COALIONTI BEHIND THE PROPOSAL. LET鈥橲 BEGIN WITH TSEHE PHRASES DEFUND THE POLICE, REFORM THE POLICE. SOME PEOPLE SAY REALLOCATEHE T THE MONEY THATS I SPENT ON POLICING. WHAT EXACTLY IS THE GOALF O QUESTION 2 ?JANAE: QUESTION 2 IS AUTBO EXPANDING PUBLIC SAFETY. WE KNOW THAT IN THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, MANY POLICE OFFICERS HAVE NAMED AND RESIDENTS HAVE REALIZED THAT WE鈥橰E CALLING ON POLICE TBEO EVERYTHING. TO BE SOCIAL WORKERS AND MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALSND A HOMELESS OUTREACH COORDINATORS. AND THE REALITY IS, IS THAT ETH CITY IS NOT CURRENTLY RESOURCED TO HAVE ALL OF THOSE QUALIFI PROFESSIONALS WITHIN THE CITY. SO THE QUESTION 2 ALLOWS YOU TO EXPAND PLIUBC SAFETY SO THAT THE MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT ACTUALLY BECOMES A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ALLOWING ALL THESE OTHER QUALIFIED PROFESSIONALS TO BE A PART OF IT. SOLEDAD: CAN YOU EXPLAIN TO ME THEN HOW IT WOS? JANAE: SO WHAT WE KNOW ITHS AT THE 911 RESPONDERS WOULD BE TRAINED TO KNOW WHEN IT鈥橲 APPROPRIATE, WHEN IT鈥橲AS FEO T DISPATCH A DIFFERENT PROFESSIALON THAN AN ARMED POLICE OFFICER. WE SAW THIS HAPPEN IN THE CITY OF DENVER, COLORADO, FOR EXAMPLE. THEY鈥橵E BEEN ABLE TO PILOT THEIR STAR PROGRAM FOR THE LAST SIX MONTHS, WHERE THEY HAVE DHA ALMOST 800 CALLS THAT REWE DIVERTED FROM POLICE TAO MEDICAL TEAM AND A UNIT THATAS PREPARED WITH MENTAL HEALTH PROVIDERS, HOMELESS OUTREACH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SPECIALISTS. SOLEDAD: WHO WOULD BE IN CHAERG OF THIS NEW PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTNTME JANAE: YES, IT WOULDE B DEPARTMENT COMMISSIONER, WHO IS NOMINATED AND APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND THE MAYOR. AND THIS IS THE SAME PROCESS THAT EVERY SINGLE DEPARTMENT IN THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS ACTUALLY GOES THROUGH FOR THEIR OVERSIGHT STRUCTURE. I THINK ONE OF THE BIG WORRIES THAT WE HEAR IS, IS ISTH ACTUALLY ABOUT ABOLISHING ETH POLICE OR DEFUNDG THINE POLICE? BUT THE REALITY IS, IS THAT IT ESDO NEITHER. AS A MATTER OF FACT,HE TRE IS A STATE STATUTE THAT MANDATES THAT POLICE OFFICERS RESPOND TO A SERIES OF SITUATIONS WITHIN ETH CITY. NOTHING ABOUT THIS CHARTER CHANGE WOULD UNDERMINE THAT OR OVERRIDE THAT. THE OTHER THING IS THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AS AN ENTY,IT WILL CONTINUEN. O THEY鈥橪L CONTINUE PATROL AND RESPONSE, AND THE CITY GETS TO ADD ALL THESE OTHER QUALIFDIE PROFESSIONALS TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. SOLEDAD: I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE POINT TO SOME RISING NUMBE, SPECIFICALLY IN HOMIDECIS, AND I THINK THAT GETS USED TO BE A STARTING POINT OF THIS IS NOT THE RIGHT TIME. WE SHOULD BE DOUBLING DOWN ON LAW ENFORCEMENT, NOT EVEN THINKING ABOUT REFM. JANAE: THE REALITY IS AS WE CONTINUE TO POUR MONEY INTO AN ARMED POLICE ONLY MODEL AND PEOPLE CONTINUE TO DIE. THE REALITY IS IS WE KEEP POURING MORE AND MORE MONEY INTO A MODETHL AT DOESN鈥橳 WORK AND AND WE HAVEN鈥橳 ACTUALLY LEANED INTO THESE THINGS THAT I鈥橵E NAMED LIKE THE PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION STRATEGIES THAT HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO LOWER ISSUES OFUN G VIOLENCE. WE DON鈥橳 HAVE TO CONTINUEO T STUDY AND RESEARCH AND ADMIRE, QUITE FRANKLY, THESE PROBLEM WE CAN ACTUALLY TAKE A BOLD STEP FORWARD AND IT IS ONE STEP, RIGHT? SOLEDAD: JANAE BATES IS THE MINISTER, AND SHE鈥橲 THE CO
Advertisement
Minneapolis voters reject replacing police with new agency after George Floyd's death
Minneapolis voters on Tuesday rejected a proposal to replace the city's police department with a new Department of Public Safety, an idea that supporters had hoped would bring radical change to policing in the city where George Floyd's death under an officer's knee brought calls for racial justice.The initiative would have changed the city charter to remove a requirement that the city have a police department with a minimum number of officers. Supporters said a complete overhaul of policing was necessary to stop police violence. Opponents said the proposal had no concrete plan for how to move forward and warned it would leave some communities already affected by violence more vulnerable as crime is on the rise.The ballot proposal had roots in the abolish-the-police movement that erupted after Floyd was killed by a Minneapolis police officer last year. The debate over racial justice in policing brought national attention to Tuesday's vote, as well as a river of out-of-state money seeking to influence the outcome that could have shaped change elsewhere, too.The ballot question called for a new Department of Public Safety to take "a comprehensive public health approach to the delivery of functions" that would be determined by the mayor and City Council. Supporters argued it was a chance to reimagine what public safety can be and how money gets spent. Among other things, supporters said, funding would go toward programs that don't send armed officers to call on people in crisis.Democratic Mayor Jacob Frey was also in a tough fight for a second term, facing a bevy of opponents who have attacked him for his leadership in the wake of Floyd's death. Frey opposed the policing amendment. Two of his leading challengers in the field of 17 candidates, Sheila Nezhad and Kate Knuth, strongly supported the proposal. With nearly complete returns, Frey had about 43% of the vote. He needed 50% to win under the city's ranked-choice voting system, with the city to begin sorting second- and third-place choices Wednesday morning.Frey had 44% of the first-choice votes with over 70% of precincts reporting, while Nezhad and Knuth were both near 20%. But Frey would need 50% to win outright Tuesday night under Minneapolis' ranked choice voting system. Otherwise, the outcome would be determined Wednesday when the second- and potentially the third-choice votes are tallied.Minneapolis voters were also deciding whether to replace the city's unusual "weak mayor, strong council" system with a more conventional distribution of executive and legislative powers that would give the mayor clearer authority over day-to-day government operations.The future of policing in the city where Floyd's death in May 2020 launched a nationwide reckoning on racial justice overshadowed everything on the municipal ballot. The debate brought national attention to the election, as well as a river of out-of-state money seeking to influence a contest that could shape changes in policing elsewhere, too.Rishi Khanna, 31, a tech worker, voted yes on replacing the police department, saying he doesn't believe police officers are qualified to deal with many situations, such as mental health crises. He said he thinks having professionals equipped to deal with a range of public safety issues in the same department as law enforcement will benefit both residents and police officers."I understand that law enforcement will have to have a seat at the table, but I think both in our community and in communities around the country, too often law enforcement is the only seat at the table," he said. "I don't think that's the right solution."Askari Lyons, 61, voted against the ballot initiative. A resident of the city's largely Black north side, where violent crime runs higher than in the rest of the city, he said he believes Minneapolis police officers "may have learned a lesson after George Floyd's death and what happened to the cop that killed him."Lyons called it "unwise" to replace the department and said he believes change within the department is imminent."People are so frustrated, so angry, so disappointed" with the violence occurring citywide as much as they are with the city's law enforcement, he said.The proposed amendment to the city charter would have removed language that mandates that Minneapolis have a police department with a minimum number of officers based on population. It would have been replaced by a new Department of Public Safety that would take a "comprehensive public health approach to the delivery of functions" that "could include" police officers "if necessary, to fulfill its responsibilities for public safety."Supporters of the change argued that a complete overhaul of policing is necessary to stop police violence. They framed it as a chance to re-imagine what public safety can be and to devote more funding toward new approaches that don't rely on sending armed officers to deal with people in crisis.But opponents said the ballot proposal contained no concrete plan for how the new department would operate and expressed fear that it might make communities already affected by gun violence even more vulnerable to rising crime. The details, and who would lead the new agency, would be determined by the mayor and the City Council.Two nationally prominent progressive Democratic leaders 鈥� U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, who represents the Minneapolis area, and state Attorney General Keith Ellison 鈥� both supported the policing amendment. But some leading mainstream liberals, including Gov. Tim Walz and U.S. Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith, opposed it and feared the backlash could lead to Democratic losses across the country in 2022.Support didn't cleanly follow racial lines. Opponents included several prominent Black leaders, including some who have been top voices in the police accountability movement.Minister JaNa茅 Bates, a spokeswoman for the pro-amendment campaign, told reporters Monday that even if the proposal fails, the activists behind it have changed the conversation around public safety."No matter what happens, the city of Minneapolis is going to have to move forward and really wrestle with what we cannot unknow: that the Minneapolis Police Department has been able to operate with impunity and has done quite a bit of harm and the city has to take some serious steps to rectify that," Bates said.___Mohamed Ibrahim is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

Minneapolis voters on Tuesday rejected a proposal to replace the city's police department with a new Department of Public Safety, an idea that supporters had hoped would bring radical change to policing in the city where George Floyd's death under an officer's knee brought calls for racial justice.

The initiative would have changed the city charter to remove a requirement that the city have a police department with a minimum number of officers. Supporters said a complete overhaul of policing was necessary to stop police violence. Opponents said the proposal had no concrete plan for how to move forward and warned it would leave some communities already affected by violence more vulnerable as crime is on the rise.

Advertisement

The ballot proposal had roots in the abolish-the-police movement that erupted after Floyd was killed by a Minneapolis police officer last year. The debate over racial justice in policing brought national attention to Tuesday's vote, as well as a river of out-of-state money seeking to influence the outcome that could have shaped change elsewhere, too.

The ballot question called for a new Department of Public Safety to take "a comprehensive public health approach to the delivery of functions" that would be determined by the mayor and City Council. Supporters argued it was a chance to reimagine what public safety can be and how money gets spent. Among other things, supporters said, funding would go toward programs that don't send armed officers to call on people in crisis.

Democratic Mayor Jacob Frey was also in a tough fight for a second term, facing a bevy of opponents who have attacked him for his leadership in the wake of Floyd's death. Frey opposed the policing amendment. Two of his leading challengers in the field of 17 candidates, Sheila Nezhad and Kate Knuth, strongly supported the proposal.

With nearly complete returns, Frey had about 43% of the vote. He needed 50% to win under the city's ranked-choice voting system, with the city to begin sorting second- and third-place choices Wednesday morning.

Frey had 44% of the first-choice votes with over 70% of precincts reporting, while Nezhad and Knuth were both near 20%. But Frey would need 50% to win outright Tuesday night under Minneapolis' ranked choice voting system. Otherwise, the outcome would be determined Wednesday when the second- and potentially the third-choice votes are tallied.

Minneapolis voters were also deciding whether to replace the city's unusual "weak mayor, strong council" system with a more conventional distribution of executive and legislative powers that would give the mayor clearer authority over day-to-day government operations.

The future of policing in the city where Floyd's death in May 2020 launched a nationwide reckoning on racial justice overshadowed everything on the municipal ballot. The debate brought national attention to the election, as well as a river of out-of-state money seeking to influence a contest that could shape changes in policing elsewhere, too.

Rishi Khanna, 31, a tech worker, voted yes on replacing the police department, saying he doesn't believe police officers are qualified to deal with many situations, such as mental health crises. He said he thinks having professionals equipped to deal with a range of public safety issues in the same department as law enforcement will benefit both residents and police officers.

"I understand that law enforcement will have to have a seat at the table, but I think both in our community and in communities around the country, too often law enforcement is the only seat at the table," he said. "I don't think that's the right solution."

Askari Lyons, 61, voted against the ballot initiative. A resident of the city's largely Black north side, where violent crime runs higher than in the rest of the city, he said he believes Minneapolis police officers "may have learned a lesson after George Floyd's death and what happened to the cop that killed him."

Lyons called it "unwise" to replace the department and said he believes change within the department is imminent.

"People are so frustrated, so angry, so disappointed" with the violence occurring citywide as much as they are with the city's law enforcement, he said.

The proposed amendment to the city charter would have removed language that mandates that Minneapolis have a police department with a minimum number of officers based on population. It would have been replaced by a new Department of Public Safety that would take a "comprehensive public health approach to the delivery of functions" that "could include" police officers "if necessary, to fulfill its responsibilities for public safety."

Supporters of the change argued that a complete overhaul of policing is necessary to stop police violence. They framed it as a chance to re-imagine what public safety can be and to devote more funding toward new approaches that don't rely on sending armed officers to deal with people in crisis.

But opponents said the ballot proposal contained no concrete plan for how the new department would operate and expressed fear that it might make communities already affected by gun violence even more vulnerable to rising crime. The details, and who would lead the new agency, would be determined by the mayor and the City Council.

Two nationally prominent progressive Democratic leaders 鈥� U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar, who represents the Minneapolis area, and state Attorney General Keith Ellison 鈥� both supported the policing amendment. But some leading mainstream liberals, including Gov. Tim Walz and U.S. Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith, opposed it and feared the backlash could lead to Democratic losses across the country in 2022.

Support didn't cleanly follow racial lines. Opponents included several prominent Black leaders, including some who have been top voices in the police accountability movement.

Minister JaNa茅 Bates, a spokeswoman for the pro-amendment campaign, told reporters Monday that even if the proposal fails, the activists behind it have changed the conversation around public safety.

"No matter what happens, the city of Minneapolis is going to have to move forward and really wrestle with what we cannot unknow: that the Minneapolis Police Department has been able to operate with impunity and has done quite a bit of harm and the city has to take some serious steps to rectify that," Bates said.

___

Mohamed Ibrahim is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.