米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 米兰体育 13 5pm Newscast
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Newsmax defamed Dominion Voting Systems in 2020 election case, judge rules

newsmax microphone
Al Drago/Bloomberg/Getty Images via CNN Newsource
newsmax microphone
SOURCE: Al Drago/Bloomberg/Getty Images via CNN Newsource
Advertisement
Newsmax defamed Dominion Voting Systems in 2020 election case, judge rules
The right-wing network Newsmax defamed Dominion Voting Systems by falsely accusing the company of rigging the 2020 presidential election, a Delaware judge ruled Wednesday.But it鈥檒l be up to a jury to decide whether Newsmax intentionally smeared Dominion with 鈥渁ctual malice鈥� and must pay millions of dollars in damages.Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis handed down several key pretrial rulings in Dominion鈥檚 favor, weeks before a jury trial that is scheduled to begin on April 28.An out-of-court settlement is always possible. That鈥檚 how Dominion鈥檚 similar lawsuit against Fox News ended in 2023, with a record-breaking $787 million agreement.As he did in the Fox News case, Davis ruled that all of the allegations that Dominion committed massive electoral fraud in 2020 were false. He also concluded that these allegations weren鈥檛 presented on Newsmax as matters of 鈥減ure opinion鈥� from hosts or guests, which would鈥檝e given them more protections under the First Amendment.The judge鈥檚 conclusions that all of Newsmax鈥檚 election-related broadcasts in the lawsuit were defamatory is a victory for Dominion, but that doesn鈥檛 mean Newsmax has been found liable for violating defamation laws. That question will go to the jury.鈥淲e are gratified by the Court鈥檚 thorough ruling,鈥� a Dominion spokesperson said.The right-wing network denies wrongdoing and has repeatedly pointed out that it ran a 鈥渃larification鈥� segment in December 2020, and posted an article online, saying it didn鈥檛 have evidence that Dominion manipulated any votes.鈥淣ewsmax covered both sides of the 2020 election dispute fairly,鈥� a Newsmax spokesperson said in a statement. 鈥淎t no time did it defame Dominion. This case represents a serious threat to free speech and a free press and Newsmax will defend itself vigorously at trial.鈥漈aken together, the rulings increase the chances that Newsmax might feel compelled to settle the case instead of rolling its dice with a jury that might award significant damages to Dominion. The voting technology company is asking for more than $1 billion, which Newsmax鈥檚 lawyers have argued is a massively inflated figure detached from real losses.The case stems from false on-air allegations from Newsmax hosts and guests that Dominion colluded with Democratic operatives to manipulate millions of votes in 2020, flipping votes from President Donald Trump in order to elect then-candidate Joe Biden.Newsmax, which is led by Trump ally Chris Ruddy, launched its initial public offering last week. If a trial does happen, Ruddy and some of the network鈥檚 TV hosts, like Greg Kelly and Chris Salcedo, are expected to testify. Newsmax agreed in September to pay $40 million to settle a lawsuit from Smartmatic, another voting company that was similarly smeared.

The right-wing network Newsmax defamed Dominion Voting Systems by falsely accusing the company of rigging the 2020 presidential election,

But it鈥檒l be up to a jury to decide whether Newsmax intentionally smeared Dominion with 鈥渁ctual malice鈥� and must pay millions of dollars in damages.

Advertisement

Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis handed down several key pretrial rulings in Dominion鈥檚 favor, weeks before a jury trial that is scheduled to begin on April 28.

An out-of-court settlement is always possible. That鈥檚 how Dominion鈥檚 similar lawsuit against Fox News ended in 2023, with a record-breaking $787 million agreement.

As he did in the Fox News case, Davis ruled that all of the allegations that Dominion committed massive electoral fraud in 2020 were false. He also concluded that these allegations weren鈥檛 presented on Newsmax as matters of 鈥減ure opinion鈥� from hosts or guests, which would鈥檝e given them more protections under the First Amendment.

The judge鈥檚 conclusions that all of Newsmax鈥檚 election-related broadcasts in the lawsuit were defamatory is a victory for Dominion, but that doesn鈥檛 mean Newsmax has been found liable for violating defamation laws. That question will go to the jury.

鈥淲e are gratified by the Court鈥檚 thorough ruling,鈥� a Dominion spokesperson said.

The right-wing network denies wrongdoing and has repeatedly pointed out that it ran a 鈥渃larification鈥� segment in December 2020, and posted an article online, saying it didn鈥檛 have evidence that Dominion manipulated any votes.

鈥淣ewsmax covered both sides of the 2020 election dispute fairly,鈥� a Newsmax spokesperson said in a statement. 鈥淎t no time did it defame Dominion. This case represents a serious threat to free speech and a free press and Newsmax will defend itself vigorously at trial.鈥�

Taken together, the rulings increase the chances that Newsmax might feel compelled to settle the case instead of rolling its dice with a jury that might award significant damages to Dominion. The voting technology company is asking for more than $1 billion, which Newsmax鈥檚 lawyers have argued is a massively inflated figure detached from real losses.

The case stems from false on-air allegations from Newsmax hosts and guests that Dominion colluded with Democratic operatives to manipulate millions of votes in 2020, flipping votes from President Donald Trump in order to elect then-candidate Joe Biden.

Newsmax, which is led by Trump ally Chris Ruddy, launched its initial public offering last week. If a trial does happen, Ruddy and some of the network鈥檚 TV hosts, like Greg Kelly and Chris Salcedo, are expected to testify. Newsmax agreed in September to pay $40 million to settle a lawsuit from Smartmatic, another voting company that was similarly smeared.