米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 米兰体育 13 10p Newscast
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Supreme Court says Maryland parents can pull their kids from public school lessons using LGBTQ books

Supreme Court says Maryland parents can pull their kids from public school lessons using LGBTQ books
WITH BREAKING NEWS. THAT BREAKING NEWS. PARTS OF IOWA鈥橲 SCHOOL BOOK BAN LAW WILL NOT BE ENFORCED AT THE START OF THE NEW YEAR, A FEDERAL JUDGE IS PUTTING PORTIONS OF THIS NEW LAW ON PAUSE. NOW, THIS IS A PRETTY COMPLICATED CASE, BUT KCCI PEPPER PURPURA IS HERE TO BREAK THIS ALL DOWN FOR US. HEY, PEPPER. THAT鈥橲 RIGHT. JODI. BEN, THIS LAW IS ONE WE HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT FOR MONTHS. IT WOULD HAVE MADE IT ILLEGAL FOR SCHOOLS TO HAVE BOOKS DEPICTING SEX ACTS. PLUS, IT WAS GOING TO BAN THE TEACHING OF GENDER IDENTITY AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION. ASHTON FOR SOME STUDENTS. THEN LATE THIS AFTERNOON, THE JUDGE RELEASED HIS DECISION. IT鈥橲 BLOCKED. THE JUDGE CALLED THE LAW, QUOTE, INCREDIBLY BROAD AND UNLIKELY TO SATISFY THE FIRST AMENDMENT UNDER ANY STANDARD OF SCRUTINY, HE SAYS. FOR NOW, THE LAW CANNOT REQUIRE SCHOOLS TO REMOVE BOOKS OR STOP THEM FROM TEACHING LGBTQ. PLUS SUBJECTS. HOWEVER, PART OF THE LAW WILL STAND THE PORTION NOT BEING BLOCKED, A RULE REQUIRING SCHOOLS TO TELL PARENTS IF THEIR CHILD ASKS FOR GENDER ACCOMMODATIONS, LIKE USING A DIFFERENT NAME OR DIFFERENT PRONOUNS. IOWA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION PRESIDENT SAYS, QUOTE, THIS IS A BIG WIN. THIS RULING MEANS TEACHERS CAN CONTINUE TO SUCCESSFULLY GUIDING ALL STUDENTS WITHOUT FEAR OF PUNISHMENT OR LOSING THEIR JOBS. GOVERNOR REYNOLDS ALSO JUSTRILLIONESPONDED LAST 15 MINUTES, SAYING SHE鈥橲 EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTED SHE SAID INSTRUCTION ON GENDER IDENTITY AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION HAS NO PLACE IN K THROUGH SIX CLASSROOMS AND BOOKS WITH SEXUALLY. EXPLICIT CONTENT. QUOTE DO NOT BELONG IN THE SCHOOL LIBRARY FOR CHILDREN, THEN SAID THE FACT THAT WE鈥橰E EVEN ARGUING THESE ISSUES IS RIDICULOUS AND QUOTE, THE REAL DEBATE SHOULD BE ABOUT WHY SOCIETY IS SO INTENT ON OVERSEXUALIZING OUR YOUNG CHILDREN. THE ACLU SAYS IT IS GLAD THAT IOWA FAMILIES AND STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO CONTINUE THE SCHOOL YEAR WITHOUT THE LAW HANGING OVER THEIR HEADS, IT SAYS THE DECISION SENDS A STRONG MESSAGE THAT BOOK BANS CANNOT STAND AND IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE NONE OF THIS IS FINAL.
AP logo
Updated: 10:01 AM CDT Jun 27, 2025
Editorial Standards 鈸�
Advertisement
Supreme Court says Maryland parents can pull their kids from public school lessons using LGBTQ books
AP logo
Updated: 10:01 AM CDT Jun 27, 2025
Editorial Standards 鈸�
The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Maryland parents who have religious objections can pull their children from public school lessons using LGBTQ storybooks.Related video above: Judge blocks most of an Iowa law banning some school library books and discussion of LGBTQ+ issues The justices reversed lower-court rulings in favor of the Montgomery County school system in suburban Washington. The high court ruled that the schools likely could not require elementary school children to sit through lessons involving the books if parents expressed religious objections to the material.The decision was not a final ruling in the case, but the justices strongly suggested that the parents will win in the end.The court ruled that policies like the one at issue in the case are subjected to the strictest level of review, nearly always dooming them.The school district introduced the storybooks, including 鈥淧rince & Knight鈥� and 鈥淯ncle Bobby鈥檚 Wedding,鈥� in 2022 as part of an effort to better reflect the district鈥檚 diversity. In 鈥淯ncle Bobby鈥檚 Wedding,鈥� a niece worries that her uncle won't have as much time for her after he gets married to another man.The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years and the case is among several religious-rights cases at the court this term. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries.Many of the removals were organized by Moms for Liberty and other conservative organizations that advocate for more parental input over what books are available to students. Soon after President Donald Trump, a Republican, took office in January, the Education Department called the book bans a 鈥渉oax鈥� and dismissed 11 complaints that had been filed under Trump's predecessor, President Joe Biden, a Democrat.The writers鈥� group Pen America said in a court filing in the Maryland case that the objecting parents wanted 鈥渁 constitutionally suspect book ban by another name.鈥� Pen America reported more than 10,000 books were banned in the last school year.Parents initially had been allowed to opt their children out of the lessons for religious and other reasons, but the school board reversed course a year later, prompting protests and eventually a lawsuit.At arguments in April, a lawyer for the school district told the justices that the 鈥渙pt outs鈥� had become disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction in Montgomery schools that students can be excused from, lawyer Alan Schoenfeld said.The case hit unusually close to home, as three justices live in the county, though they didn't send their children to public schools.

The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that Maryland parents who have religious objections can pull their children from public school lessons using LGBTQ storybooks.

Related video above: Judge blocks most of an Iowa law banning some school library books and discussion of LGBTQ+ issues

Advertisement

The justices reversed lower-court rulings in favor of the Montgomery County school system in suburban Washington. The high court ruled that the schools likely could not require elementary school children to sit through lessons involving the books if parents expressed religious objections to the material.

The decision was not a final ruling in the case, but the justices strongly suggested that the parents will win in the end.

The court ruled that policies like the one at issue in the case are subjected to the strictest level of review, nearly always dooming them.

The school district introduced the storybooks, including 鈥淧rince & Knight鈥� and 鈥淯ncle Bobby鈥檚 Wedding,鈥� in 2022 as part of an effort to better reflect the district鈥檚 diversity. In 鈥淯ncle Bobby鈥檚 Wedding,鈥� a niece worries that her uncle won't have as much time for her after he gets married to another man.

The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years and the case is among several religious-rights cases at the court this term. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries.

Many of the removals were organized by Moms for Liberty and other conservative organizations that advocate for more parental input over what books are available to students. Soon after President Donald Trump, a Republican, took office in January, the Education Department called the book bans a 鈥渉oax鈥� and dismissed 11 complaints that had been filed under Trump's predecessor, President Joe Biden, a Democrat.

The writers鈥� group Pen America said in a court filing in the Maryland case that the objecting parents wanted 鈥渁 constitutionally suspect book ban by another name.鈥� Pen America reported more than 10,000 books were banned in the last school year.

Parents initially had been allowed to opt their children out of the lessons for religious and other reasons, but the school board reversed course a year later, prompting protests and eventually a lawsuit.

At arguments in April, a lawyer for the school district told the justices that the 鈥渙pt outs鈥� had become disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction in Montgomery schools that students can be excused from, lawyer Alan Schoenfeld said.

The case hit unusually close to home, as three justices live in the county, though they didn't send their children to public schools.