米兰体育

Skip to content
NOWCAST 米兰体育 13 Midday Newscast
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to take AG's request to block Elon Musk's $1 million payments

The decision came just moments before Musk spoke at a Green Bay town hall.

Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to take AG's request to block Elon Musk's $1 million payments

The decision came just moments before Musk spoke at a Green Bay town hall.

CUSTOM ALERTS. BREAKING NEWS JUST INTO OUR NEWSROOM THIS MORNING. THE LATEST DEVELOPMENT INTO AN ONGOING LEGAL BATTLE WITH JUST TWO DAYS UNTIL A CRITICAL STATE SUPREME COURT RACE. ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH KAUL FILING A PETITION WITH THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT, THE STATE SUPREME COURT, TO HALT ELON MUSK MILLION DOLLAR GIVEAWAYS AT AN EVENT LATER TODAY IN GREEN BAY. NOW CALLED MOVING FOR AN EMERGENCY INJUNCTION, SAYING IN PART, QUOTE, RESOLUTION OF THIS LEGAL ISSUE IS URGENT. RESPONDENTS HAVE PROMISED TO GIVE AWAY THE $1 MILLION PRIZES AT AN EVENT SCHEDULED TO BEGIN AT 6:30 P.M. THIS EVENING, MARCH 30TH, 2025. GOING ON IN THIS FILING TO SAY, QUOTE, IF THIS COURT DOES NOT TAKE PROMPT ACTION AND THE PRIZES ARE AWARDED, THE INJURY TO PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN THE VALIDITY OF THIS ELECTION CANNOT BE UNDONE. END QUOTE. NOW, THIS IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL鈥橲 THIRD ATTEMPT TO STOP THE GIVEAWAY. AFTER WISCONSIN APPEALS COURT DENIED CALLS EFFORT LAST NIGHT, AND THEN A CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE REFUSED TO HEAR THE CASE FRIDAY, MUSK IS BACKING BRAD SCHIMMEL. SCHIMMEL IS RUNNING AS THE CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE AGAINST LIBERAL CANDIDATE SUSAN CRAWFORD. SO WE KIND OF WANT TO BRING YOU UP TO DATE ON HOW THIS LEGAL DISPUTE BEGAN. THURSDAY. MUSK POSTED TO X HIS SUNDAY EVENT IN GREEN BAY WOULD BE LIMITED TO THOSE WHO HAVE VOTED IN THE SUPREME COURT ELECTION, AND THAT HE WOULD, QUOTE PERSONALLY HAND OVER TWO CHECKS FOR $1 MILLION FOR THOSE TAKING THE TIME TO VOTE, END QUOTE. WELL, FRIDAY MORNING, MUSK DELETED THAT INITIAL POST, SAYING HE WANTED TO CLARIFY HIS MESSAGE, NOW SAYING ENTRANCE WILL BE LIMITED TO THOSE, QUOTE, WHO HAVE SIGNED A PETITION, OPPOSED ACTIVIST JUDGES AND THAT HE WOULD, QUOTE, HAND OVER CHECKS FOR $1 MILLION TO TWO PEOPLE TO BE SPOKESMAN FOR THE PETITION, END QUOTE. SO THAT SPARKED LEGAL ACTION FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL CARL SUING TO BLOCK THE GIVEAWAYS, OFFERING ANY VALUE TO INDUCE A VOTER TO CAST A BALLOT OR REFRAIN FROM VOTING. HEADS UP. THAT IS A FELONY HERE IN WISCONSIN. SO SATURDAY, THE APPEALS COURT DENIED THE MOTION, THE ORDER SAYING IN PART, QUOTE, WE CONCLUDE THAT THE PETITION FAILS TO SHOW THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS ENTITLED TO ANY FORM OF RELIEF THAT THIS COURT IS PERMITTED TO PROVIDE. END QUOTE. SO NOW, BREAKING THIS MORNING CALL APPEALING TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT AND THE QUESTION NOW IN THE NEXT 12 HOURS IS WILL THE SUPREME COURT TAKE THE REQUEST, AND IF SO, WILL ANY OF THE JUSTICES RECUSE THEMSELVES? THERE ARE FOUR LIBERAL JUSTICES ON THE WISCONSIN STATE SUPREME COURT. THE FOUR OF THEM MAKE UP THE COURT鈥橲 MAJORITY AND HAVE BEEN CAMPAIGNING FOR SUSAN CRAWFORD. AND THAT INCLUDES OUTGOING JUSTICE AND WALSH BRADLEY, WHO SPOKE WITH 12 NEWS ABOUT ELON MUSK MONEY GIVEAWAY EARLIER THIS WEEK. WE CAN鈥橳 SURRENDER OUR COURT SYSTEM TO ELON MUSK. WE CAN鈥橳 SURRENDER WHO WE ARE AS A PEOPLE AND WHAT WE BELIEVE IN AS A STATE. POLITICAL LEADERS IN GREEN BAY, WHERE THE MUSK EVENT WILL BE HELD, GIVING SHARPLY DIFFERENT REACTIONS TO THE EVENT. THERE. HE鈥橲 AN OUT OF STATE BILLIONAIRE ROBBER BARON THAT IS TRYING TO, YOU KNOW, PUT HIS MONEY IN THIS ELECTION TO RIG THE SYSTEM. HE鈥橲 AN ESSENTIAL, I THINK, PART OF THE MOVEMENT THAT WE鈥橰E ALL A PART OF. AND I THINK IT鈥橲 VERY EXCITING TO BE ABLE TO SEE HIM IN PERSON AND SORT OF LIKE SEE THE REACTION AND THE ENERGY. THAT 12 NEWS CREW IS CURRENTLY GOING THROUGH. THE LATEST COURT FILINGS
Advertisement
Wisconsin Supreme Court refuses to take AG's request to block Elon Musk's $1 million payments

The decision came just moments before Musk spoke at a Green Bay town hall.

A unanimous Wisconsin Supreme Court on Sunday refused to hear a last-minute attempt by the state's Democratic attorney general to stop billionaire Elon Musk from handing over $1 million checks to two voters, a ruling that came just minutes before the planned start of the rally. Two lower courts had already rejected the legal challenge by Democrat Josh Kaul, who argues that Musk's offer violates a state law. 鈥淲isconsin law prohibits offering anything of value to induce anyone to vote,鈥� Kaul argued in his filing. 鈥淵et, Elon Musk did just that.鈥漋ideo above: Kaul appeals to state Supreme Court to stop Elon Musk's $2 million payments to Wisconsin votersBut the state Supreme Court, which is currently controlled 4-3 by liberal justices, declined to take the case as an original action.Musk鈥檚 attorneys argued in filings with the court that Musk was exercising his free speech rights with the giveaways and any attempt to restrict that would violate both the Wisconsin and U.S. constitutions.The payments are 鈥渋ntended to generate a grassroots movement in opposition to activist judges, not to expressly advocate for or against any candidate,鈥� Musk鈥檚 attorneys argued in court filings.Wisconsin鈥檚 tightly contested Supreme Court election, where ideological control of the court is at stake, is on Tuesday. Liberals currently hold a 4-3 majority.The court's four liberal justices have endorsed Dane County Judge Susan Crawford, the Democratic-backed candidate.Musk鈥檚 attorneys, about four hours before the rally was to begin, asked that two liberal justices who have campaigned for Crawford 鈥� Jill Karofsky and Rebecca Dallet 鈥� recuse themselves from the case. His attorneys argued their work for Crawford creates 鈥渢he specter of inappropriate bias.鈥� If they did recuse, that would leave the court with a 3-2 conservative majority.Both justices rejected the request and said they would spell out their reasons why at a later date.One of the court's conservative justices has endorsed Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel, who also has the backing of Trump and Musk. Schimel wore a 鈥淢ake America Great Again" hat while campaigning Sunday.At the rally scheduled in Green Bay for 7:30 p.m. EST, Musk promised to hand over a pair of $1 million checks to voters who signed an online petition against 鈥渁ctivist鈥� judges. Musk and groups he supports have spent more than $20 million to help Schimel get elected.Video below: Musk changes $2 million voter reward post, Wisconsin AG files lawsuitSchimel said in a national television interview that he does not control 鈥渁ny of the spending from any outside group, whether it鈥檚 Elon Musk or anyone else鈥� and that all Trump asked was whether he would 鈥渞eject activist judges" and follow the law.鈥淭hat鈥檚 exactly what I鈥檝e committed to anybody, whether it鈥檚 President Trump, Elon Musk or any donors and donors or supporters or voters in Wisconsin. That鈥檚 my commitment,鈥� Schimel told 鈥淔ox News Sunday.鈥漇chimel said on Friday that he has "no plans" to attend Sunday's rally with Musk.Crawford's campaign declined comment on Kaul's legal filing.The contest has shattered national spending records for a judicial election, with more than $81 million in spending.Musk鈥檚 political action committee used a nearly identical tactic before the presidential election last year, offering to pay $1 million a day to voters in Wisconsin and six other battleground states who signed a petition supporting the First and Second Amendments. A judge in Pennsylvania said prosecutors failed to show the effort was an illegal lottery and allowed it to continue through Election Day.Musk on Friday initially said in a post on his social media platform, X, that he planned to 鈥減ersonally hand over鈥� $2 million to a pair of voters who have already cast their ballots in the race.Musk later posted a clarification, saying the money would go to people who will be 鈥渟pokesmen鈥� for an online petition against 鈥渁ctivist鈥� judges. After first saying the event would only be open to people who had voted in the Supreme Court race, he said attendance would be limited to those who have signed the petition.Also on Friday, Musk鈥檚 political action committee identified the recipient of its first $1 million giveaway 鈥� a Green Bay man who had donated to the Wisconsin GOP and the conservative candidate in the court race, and who has a history of posting support for Trump and his agenda.The judicial election comes as Wisconsin's highest court is expected to rule on abortion rights, congressional redistricting, union power and voting rules that could affect the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election in the state.

A unanimous Wisconsin Supreme Court on Sunday refused to hear a last-minute attempt by the state's Democratic attorney general to stop billionaire Elon Musk from handing over $1 million checks to two voters, a ruling that came just minutes before the planned start of the rally.

Two lower courts had already rejected the legal challenge by Democrat Josh Kaul, who argues that Musk's offer violates a state law. 鈥淲isconsin law prohibits offering anything of value to induce anyone to vote,鈥� Kaul argued in his filing. 鈥淵et, Elon Musk did just that.鈥�

Advertisement

Video above: Kaul appeals to state Supreme Court to stop Elon Musk's $2 million payments to Wisconsin voters

But the state Supreme Court, which is currently controlled 4-3 by liberal justices, declined to take the case as an original action.

Musk鈥檚 attorneys argued in filings with the court that Musk was exercising his free speech rights with the giveaways and any attempt to restrict that would violate both the Wisconsin and U.S. constitutions.

The payments are 鈥渋ntended to generate a grassroots movement in opposition to activist judges, not to expressly advocate for or against any candidate,鈥� Musk鈥檚 attorneys argued in court filings.

Wisconsin鈥檚 tightly contested Supreme Court election, where ideological control of the court is at stake, is on Tuesday. Liberals currently hold a 4-3 majority.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

The court's four liberal justices have endorsed Dane County Judge Susan Crawford, the Democratic-backed candidate.

Musk鈥檚 attorneys, about four hours before the rally was to begin, asked that two liberal justices who have campaigned for Crawford 鈥� Jill Karofsky and Rebecca Dallet 鈥� recuse themselves from the case. His attorneys argued their work for Crawford creates 鈥渢he specter of inappropriate bias.鈥� If they did recuse, that would leave the court with a 3-2 conservative majority.

Both justices rejected the request and said they would spell out their reasons why at a later date.

One of the court's conservative justices has endorsed Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel, who also has the backing of Trump and Musk. Schimel wore a 鈥淢ake America Great Again" hat while campaigning Sunday.

At the rally scheduled in Green Bay for 7:30 p.m. EST, Musk promised to hand over a pair of $1 million checks to voters who signed an online petition against 鈥渁ctivist鈥� judges. Musk and groups he supports have spent more than $20 million to help Schimel get elected.

Video below: Musk changes $2 million voter reward post, Wisconsin AG files lawsuit


Schimel said in a national television interview that he does not control 鈥渁ny of the spending from any outside group, whether it鈥檚 Elon Musk or anyone else鈥� and that all Trump asked was whether he would 鈥渞eject activist judges" and follow the law.

鈥淭hat鈥檚 exactly what I鈥檝e committed to anybody, whether it鈥檚 President Trump, Elon Musk or any donors and donors or supporters or voters in Wisconsin. That鈥檚 my commitment,鈥� Schimel told 鈥淔ox News Sunday.鈥�

Schimel said on Friday that he has .

Crawford's campaign declined comment on Kaul's legal filing.

The contest has shattered national spending records for a judicial election, with more than $81 million in spending.

Musk鈥檚 political action committee used a nearly identical tactic before the presidential election last year, offering to pay $1 million a day to voters in Wisconsin and six other battleground states who signed a petition supporting the First and Second Amendments. A judge in Pennsylvania said prosecutors failed to show the effort was an illegal lottery and allowed it to continue through Election Day.


Musk on Friday initially said in a post on his social media platform, X, that he planned to 鈥減ersonally hand over鈥� $2 million to a pair of voters who have already cast their ballots in the race.

Musk later posted a clarification, saying the money would go to people who will be 鈥渟pokesmen鈥� for an online petition against 鈥渁ctivist鈥� judges. After first saying the event would only be open to people who had voted in the Supreme Court race, he said attendance would be limited to those who have signed the petition.

Also on Friday, Musk鈥檚 political action committee identified the recipient of its first $1 million giveaway 鈥� a Green Bay man who had donated to the Wisconsin GOP and the conservative candidate in the court race, and who has a history of posting support for Trump and his agenda.

The judicial election comes as Wisconsin's highest court is expected to rule on abortion rights, congressional redistricting, union power and voting rules that could affect the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election in the state.